I know I have already commented but I was just thinking of one of the major barriers (in my experience) that people put up to reject EVs as a viable option. Basically it is the concept that the EV dictates how you travel, not the occupants?
A perfect personal example for me. Our last car was an E-Ton 50 and during a 220 mile family trip from the east to the west coast of Ireland, we had two choices.
A faster more direct route utilising a rapid charger and stopping for 20 - 45 minutes to avail of the ever so delightful motorway service station facilities and some pre-cooked and reheated meals. This is the typical scenario for EV owners and most of them try to convince themselves and others, that this is a perfectly nice way to spend some family time.
Or a slightly longer less direct route with a detour to stop for a few hours at Kildare shopping village, do some shopping, see some of the sights and grab a nice fresh cooked lunch in much better surroundings. The less direct route only had AC chargers, so 11kW max but we were ready to go after 3 hours ('we' being the operative word). At this point the car had 70 more miles of range and we got to the west coast nicely refreshed and we have some nice memories of Kildare.
Had the car only been able to do 7kW we would have needed to stay for about 4.5 hours for the same 70ish miles of charge and while hardly a horrible prospect, it would mean sitting around impatiently waiting for the car to give us the range and buffer we needed.
A perfect case of the EV dictating the agenda and not the other way around.